You complied with the wishes of the aggrieved advertiser as well as canceling the ads of your entire network of advertisers stating to us that you were concerned about our use of Nazi symbols. We were responsive to your e-mails with replies which explained that the context in which we used the symbol did not in any way glorify Nazis or their actions.

One of our concerns is that Nazism, a form of fascism, is a symbiotic relationship of business, government and the military in which they each control and support the other for their mutual benefit, using tools such as censorship. The article which you seem to be troubled by is very critical of the current administration and our president.

Our refusal to be censored is our stand against any business, government or military entity who wishes to silence our voice. We find it odd that the article which has raised so much commotion was published several months ago, yet not reacted to until now. We find it odd that the day before you cancelled our ads we ran a scathing article entitled "Day 51 Revisited" which was about government actions which caused the horrible event known as the Mount Carmel Massacre (http://earthblog.net/eb-articles/hartman10.html).

Could this be a mere coincidence? Sure, just like the fact that you cancelled our ads on April 20th, the birthday of the main Nazi who seemed to trouble you so much. We don't have enough facts about your actions to go beyond simply accusing you of attempted censorship. One reason for this is that your original unsigned e-mail which informed us of your actions was only a few lines long and didn't fully explain your reasoning.